Flu Jab Vaccinations Promoted On Campbell Live Show, NZ 18th April 2012

Vaccinations Can Damage Your Immune System.

John Campbell TV3 has let us down.  Generally speaking,  I like his style of reporting and discussion, as he usually examines both sides of the issue in question.

DSCO 1823

However, on the issue of vaccinations for influenza which aired on tonight’s show, he failed to do this.  We only heard the view of ONE medical doctor who happened to be an advocate for flu jabs.  Makes me wonder if TV3 had been authorized by some government authority to give a pro-vaccination report, by making a seemingly investigitave approach on the issue, but without including controversial evidence against the case for vaccination.   Perhaps the drug agencies themselves had done their brain-washing on John Campbell and his producers,  so that they would conveniently ignore the other side of the question.  Were they all offered the free shots, I wonder?

At the conclusion of the vaccination topic, we  at least did have ONE TV person from channel 3 who chose not to take the vaccination – a conclusion I found to be satisfactory.  And we heard several people  earlier on state that, as they thought themselves healthy, and  they hardly ever got sick, that they would NOT be taking the flu jab.

Yet Campbell’s pro-vaccination doctor made an incredible and unbelievable statement about such healthy people  needing the flu jab more than ever.  He said that if you have not had the flu in 12 years, or whatever, then you REALLY NEEDED to have the flu jab vaccination.  Now, how can that be true?  Sounds like drug company indoctrination to me, reminiscent of the “More doctors smoke Camel’  cigarette story.

And great advertising for the doctor on the show.  Who does he know at TV3?

Campbell’s show tonight was not an impartial investigation on the effectiveness or safety of flu vaccines – it presented a case FOR vaccination, without examining any of the reasons  for NOT VACCINATING.  The doctor they had on the show was ridiculously enthusiastic about taking the vaccine, rubbing  hands and knees together gleefully in anticipation of the flu-jab customers  which were likely to flood his clinic this week after seeing this programme, swearing that flu vaccinations would do you no harm, etc, etc, but we never heard a challenge from another health professional on this doctor’s pro-rant for the flu vaccine.  Only one doctor on the show, and he was  backing the flu vaccine.

But there are plenty of doctors out there who do NOT believe in having flu jabs, or in giving their own children the regular vaccinations which are promoted by our own government agencies, and by the drug companies who  make and sell the stuff.  There ARE alternatives to taking vaccinations.

There IS a big question mark over the issue of the safety of vaccinations.  It would have been good if Campbell had bothered to look into some of the  anti-vaccine literature  published by medical people,  and by alternative health professionals.   There is plenty of research into the topic which might suggest that vaccinations are not always safe, and nor are they the best thing to prevent infections, including flu.

Vitamin C in large doses is one proven prophylactic, or preventative, for flu.  Megadoses of Vitamin C – i prefer calcium ascorbate as it is non-acidic – helps to kill off viruses and bacteria, and hastens the recovery of flu or other infections.  Vitamin A is another good one which destroys bacteria and viruses.  And there are heaps of Homeopathic remedies which will work effectively in helping to prevent or cure the flu and other infectious diseases, without damaging the body’s own  immune system.   Children generally respond well to the Homeopathic remedies recommended for childhood infectious diseases, such as mumps, whooping cough, measles, whooping cough,  and others.

But of course, if you are unfamiliar with the Homeopathic remedies, or herbal and vitamin naturopathic treatments, then you should seek advice from a qualified and experienced health practitioner to treat or prevent flu and other infectious diseases.

Read Merrilyn’s other related posts: 

Flu Vaccination Brought On Asthma And High Blood Pressure

Health Without Vaccination or Antibiotics

Vaccination Alternatives and Homeopathic Remedies For Scarlet Fever

Candida Outbreak NZ May Relate Fukushima Nuclear Contamination

Cancica Albicans can be caused by Chemicals, Radiation, and Electromagnetic forces.

I have had several interesting letters of late to do with radiation from Fukushima and how it might be affecting health here in New Zealand.  You can read these letters in the COMMENTS under  my post entitled  ‘What foods can I eat to avoid radiation’.  Ange has submitted several letters worth reading, as they contain good information.

Funnily enough, this week I have had a sudden attack of Candida, which manifests itself in my stomach.  Stomach aches and cramps and skin problems are the early signs of Candida for me.  I haven’t had this for quite a while.  I usually get it when the neighbours spray poisonous chemicals around the garden, to kill weeds and insects.  It usually lasts for a couple of weeks, until I have cleansed the toxins out of my system, then my health returns to normal.

Insecticide, fungicide as well as herbicide were actually sprayed around my house environment several weeks ago, which made me very sick.  The stuff was close to my door where the gardeners had washed out their spraying gear,  and I could not escape the fumes at night.  I was very ill for around a week, and felt on the verge of collapse. So the current candida could be an aftermath of this.

I also have bought plastic containers to store household gear including books.  Plastics really disagree with me, and I find that having these, or cardboard boxes, in the room where I am sleeping causes candida  and restless sleep quite soon after they are introduced.  The plastic containers are actually in my storeroom, but this is still a bit close for my comfort, and I plan to put these into a garage soon.

However, a friend of mine has also suddenly ”come down’ with chronic candida.   She went to a naturopath to get diagnosed on a machine, which gave her a definite result of candida.  The naturopath said that it was a common problem right at the moment, and that many people had come to her recently with candida problems.  In my friend’s case, she is also suffering the aftereffects of Brodifacoum poisoning which the council did on Shakespear Park on the Whangaparaoa Peninsula last year.  30 tonnes of Brodifacoum were reported to have been aerially dropped on the Peninsula, in three divided spreadings of 10 tonne each.  After the event of Brodifacoum poisoning at Shakespear Park, 10,000 native sea gulls were reported dead along the nearby coast, and at Maraetai, which is not very far away as the ‘crow flies’.  These deaths were said to be a result of storms at sea, but I feel sure they had something to do with the Brodifacoum pellets which were dropped by air all around the park. Anyway – the point is that this Brodifacoum is a very potent poison which is used to kill rats and other rodents, and which is banned in many countries.  This stuff alone would be enough to affect your health and give you candida for a start, along with other illnesses, if you live within a few kilometres of where the poison was dropped.

Interesting that the council assured us that the poison would only be dropped on the park side of the fence, and not on the beach side of the fence, yet they organized for workers to walk along the beach to pick up any stray bits of Brodifacoum bait after the aerially drop had been done.  If the stuff had fallen on the beach at all, there was a chance it could be picked up so that sea gulls did not eat it – but if the stuff fell a few more metres away and into the sea, it could not be recovered by people at all.  Which would mean that sea-gulls would possibly eat it.

I believe that radioactive fallout could have also contributed to this recent outbreak of candida albicans in Whangaparaoa-Orewa,  New Zealand.  My guess is that many people in other countries miles and miles away from Japan will be affected by the radiation chemicals coming from Japan, and that this will be manifested first of all with classic candida symptoms, or ‘yeast’ problems.

Poisonous chemicals themselves cause the natural intestinal flora to ‘go hay-wire’, causing the ‘bad’ bacteria to proliferate so that they destroy many of the ‘good’ bacteria in the digestive system.  When we get too many of the  candida albicans variety we suffer ‘yeast’ symptoms which can range from headaches to diarrhoea to constipation to bone pain, nerve pain, stomach pain, depression, skin disorders and the like.  Arthritic symptoms are common with people who have on-going yeast-candida problems.

The other reason why the nuclear disaster in Japan last year could have made the candida problem worse, is that the extra heat from the explosions there, and from the nuclear reactors themselves, will be contributing to a higher-than-usual air temperature globally.  Global warming, generally speaking, is contributing to people succumbing to yeast problems, as well as a diet too rich in sugars, wheat flour, gluten, and fermented foods.

It only takes a fraction of a degree in temperature, higher or lower, for the regular, simple organisms to change their normal patterns of behaviour, and for new varieties of bacteria and other organisms to develop and proliferate.  Our bodies are not used to the new conditions which global warming, and insecticides, herbicides, and food preservatives, etc, are imposing on our immune systems.  Our bodies have to adapt to these new, strange conditions, such as the effects of radiation.  One of the very first signs of disruption in the way the body functions, is the candida problem, as this is one of the organisms which thrives in these new, toxic environment. Agricultural and household chemicals, radiation from cell phones, electricity transformers, micro-waves, TV aerials, radiation from Fukushima, are all factors which will be contributing to the prevalence of candida-related illnesses.

I have just read a report from  the NZ Herald, Thursday 23 March 2012, which indicates  that the radioactive contamination from Fukushima  has been poisoning the environment for the past year since the earthquake-tsunami in Japan.  This article is entitled:

‘Fukushima contamination detected 640km away in Pacific Ocean’.

This report is no surprise to me.  The report on radiation, which is from Salt Lake City, states that the Pacific Ocean has  radiation ‘readings of up to 1000 times more than previous levels, scientists reported’.  The article goes on to diffuse the impact of the news, with Ken Buesseler of the Woods Hale Oceanographic Institution assuring us that the cesium-137 levels are far below levels which are considered to be  harmful.  Yeh, right.  Your guess is as good as mine, except that I think I would prefer to follow my own instincts, which tell me that any amount of radioactive contamination in the sea and air is going to be a bad thing.  And 1000 times more than before sounds to me like quite a lot more.

Candida is a naturally occurring organism which lives in the digestive tract.  When our diets and environments are healthy, then Candida is no problem, and it lives in harmony with the ‘good’ bacteria in the bowel.

However, there are some things which  interfere dramatically with the natural balance of the bowel flora, and this causes sickness.  Radioactive contamination is one of them.  Radiation and electromagnetic forces from electrical transformers, cell phones and towers, and satellites, etc,,  and environmental pollutants such as pesticides, herbicides and radioactive contaminants cause a reduction of the beneficial bowel flora.  When  these negative conditions prevail, the beneficial bacteria are destroyed in great numbers, which  gives the opportunity for  the rogue  yeast, Candida Albicans, to gain  ground and proliferate.

This causes the yeast Candida to over-run the body, instead of it remaining in a healthy balance with the other bacteria in the intestines.

Candida, if left untreated,  can cause arthritis, poor eye-sight,  poor brain function, cancer, alzheimer’s, multiple sclerosis, parkinsons’s disease, and many other conditions.

Foods To  Avoid To Treat Candida:

The way to treat it is to lay off all yeast foods for a start.  Avoid all wheat products, especially bread.  Gluten is bad for candida.  No vinegars, and no  sauces, as these mostly contain vinegar, which is bad for candida.  No yoghurt. Avoid all alcohol. As well, you should avoid sugar, avoid honey  and very sweet fruits, until you are better.

Green vegetables which are alkaline rather than acid foods, good oils and butter, and all protein foods, including meats, fish and eggs, are considered to be good for most people in treating candida.  When protein is deficient in the diet, and too many carbohydrates such as bread are used instead, this can lead to candida.  So make sure you have a balanced diet, plenty of protein, plenty of greens, and eat plentiful amounts of raw celery.  This is very good for curing candida, as it helps to detoxify the whole system, and it is one of the most alkaline foods available to us.

Garlic is very good for curing overgrowth of candida.  So is calcium ascorbate, an alkaline form of Vitamin C.  NZ kawakawa is especially good.  You can eat 2 leaves per day as a  herbal supplement to help get the candida under control.  Avoid eating too many potatoes or sweet potato and kumara and carrots – Potatoes have a lot of starch which turns to sugar readily – bad for candida – and carrots are very sweet, which also feeds the candida.

Fasting for a few days on fresh raw greens and boiled water can be effective in getting the candida under control.

Castor oil every second day for a week or so will eliminate the candida very quickly.  Castor oil does not seem to affect the beneficial bacteria, which is helpful.  The same goes for epsom salts which is high in magnesium.  This can eliminate the candida very quickly without affecting the beneficial bacteria. You can take a desertspoonful in about half a pint of warm water first thing in the morning or last thing at night.  Take this every second day until you have gotten over the worst of the candida attack.  This should take only several days.  Then you can reduce the dose to once or twice a week, as a preventative measure.

Calcium ascorbate does the same – gets rid of the unwanted poisons and candida, without harming the good bacteria in the intestinal flora.  An adult can take between 1000mg to 3000mg per day  until you feel better from the attack of candida, then lower the dose to a maintenance dose of between 500mg to 1000mg per day.

If you are really desperate, then the occasional dose of aspirin can help.  Two tablets used on those rare occasions when the infection is rife can do wonders. Aspirin should not be taken daily, though, as it weakens the vital organs, especially the kidneys,  when used too often. Salt is another inhibitor of candida, but of course you should not consume too much salt. If you are not on a sodium free diet, then a wee sprinkle of iodized salt could be used on meals just until the infection has passed.  Iodine is another good thing to help get candida under control, as are the B vitamins.  Use a small dab or two of iodine on the soles of the feet, or on the scalp, twice a week. Take a Vitamin B complex which is yeast-free.

Burning Mouth Syndrome From Dentures

Are Your Dentures Toxic To You?

The National Institute of Dentistry and Craniofacial Research lists a whole lot of reasons for BMS, but they conveniently exclude the possibility of poisoning from the chemicals in the plate itself.

They say that the cause can be anything    “….from nutritional deficiencies to menopause to dry mouth and allergies”,  and that the connection is unclear.  But they do not include the obvious reason – the denture itself.

But denture toxins SHOULD be listed on their list of possibilities.  Because the chemicals in a denture of plastic or acrylic fibre are highly toxic things which can damage your health.

Modern dentures are extremely suspect, because they are made of soft, porous plastic which is hydroscopic, so not only are you at risk of poisoning from the toxic components within the fibre of the denture, which leach into the body as it breaks down, but of carrying around a store-house of additional chemicals which have been absorbed into the denture.

Merrilyn’s new book has more on the subject of dentures and other health issues:

https://www.amazon.ca/Cancer-And-Good-Health-Notebook-ebook/dp/B01DHMH6DG

Sensitive people will be able to make the connection for themselves>  I have proven myself that it is the chemicals within the  modern porous denture  which have been to blame for many health problems I have suffered over the years.

True, I was seriously ill many years ago, after being sprayed by helicopter  for several hours with 245T.  This was a ‘oncer’ which had disastrous effects on my health and that of my wee toddler, and also on my unborn baby. The MAF spraying of Auckland for apple moth was another example of being poisoned due to spraying programmes.  But  people do not usually question the safety of the modern denture, and consider the possiblity that you could be poisoning yourself on a daily basis by wearing them.  Wearing dentures over many years  has given me an insight into just how toxic these things really are.

The National Institute of Dentistry’s attitude towards BMS, with what I consider to be a feigned ignorance on the issue,  – ‘we don’t really know what causes it – the connection is unclear’ – is rather like the medical profession turning a blind eye to the damage of vaccinations, or to  the negative effects of Warfarin, or Fosamax.  They promote them as being totally safe, whereas in fact, they KNOW there is a risk with these drugs. Where there is a vested interest, ignorance often prevails, and the truth is conveniently disguised.  And I am sure the same wool is used to cloud our eyes as to the real truth about modern dentures.

For a start, highly toxic glues are used to stick the teeth into place.  So, even if you have the very best of materials in a denture, you still have the glue,  which tastes like apoxy resin, and this glue will eventually start to break down and enter your system.  Apoxy resin is a known carcenogen.

The soft kind of plastics which most dental technicians like to use for convenience, because they can heat the stuff up and remould it time and time again, are porous and absorb all kinds of things, including caffeine, food preservatives, and chemicals in the environment such as pesticides.  You end up with a cocktail of poisons which is incredibly potent.  And at the same time your dentures are absorbing more chemicals, the soft plastic is beginning to break down, accelerated by the saliva in the mouth, food substances, hot food and drinks, etc.  You end up with a combination of  toxic chemicals in the dental plate  being leached into your body.

The process of leaching works pretty much in the same way as a mercury filling continually emmits a small amount of poisonous compounds into the body.  It may be a small amount of poison, but it affects the body adversely, nevertheless.

The softer the plastic, the less stable it is, and the more quickly will it break down.  That is a fact.  So it stands to reason that the tough, concrete-like plastics which were formerly used, such as my father still wears from the 2nd world war, are going to be less problematic as far as poisoning from a denture goes.

I have had two very good communications from readers on the subject of dentures and their toxicity – You can read these comments for yourself under my post entitled ‘Toxic Dentures’.

One person commenting on my blog  has experienced the very same problem, or one of them, which I experienced after just less than a year of wearing a brand new denture – BMS, or Burning Mouth Syndrome.  Eventually, I had to discard the dentures completely, as they were so toxic to me, even after only one year.  Now I go about without dentures at all, rather than have the toxic materials in dentures sitting in my mouth and poisoning my whole body, as well as  giving me the BMS.  Tingling and numbness in the arms and hands, dizziness,  blurred vision, loss of memory, speech affected, nerve twitches, burning mouth, and depression all returned when I tried using the teeth again.  But these symptoms all disappear like magic once the teeth are removed.

It is not my health that is to blame, as the ‘experts’ would claim, but my sensitivity to extremely hazardous chemicals which make up those dentures. But I would not have it otherwise, as being sensitive to poisons can be a great safeguard against getting cancer and other degenerative disease, if you only listen to what your body tells you.  I have often been warned about chemical hazards which I have been able to avoid, because of my chemical sensitivity.  However, I must say that vanity has gotten the better of me with the denture problem, and I have possibly only listened too late.  I should have stopped wearing dentures years ago, when I first noticed their deleterious effect.  I believe I may still be prone to getting cancer because of my immune system suffering through the wearing of toxic dental plastic.

I have found the same problem with dentures over the past 35 years of wearing dentures  – They only have a limited life span for me, which is usually about 2 or 3 years, experience tells me. Then the poisoning symptoms start.  My dental technician was angry with me because I was adamant that it was the poisons in the teeth which were causing my health problems , including the burning mouth  – He claimed that it was because of germs in the denture.  Bacteria.  –  Of course, this is likely as well, but once the germs get there, and begin to feed on the cocktail of absorbed poisons, and the plastic is leaching poisons, you cannot do much about it.  No amount of denture cleaners will have any good effect.  Denture cleaners are toxic in themselves, and these  denture cleaning chemicals are absorbed into the plate which always makes the reactions worse for me, especially the BMS.

I found that the denture cleaner my dentist assured me would fix the problem, because it would kill the bacteria, he said, actually made the poison problem worse.  My mouth was raw to bleeding. The chemical stuff from the denture cleaner, intended for the germs, got absorbed into the denture plastic, and it was several weeks before the taste of the cleaner dissipated from the teeth, even after I had ceased to use it.

I thought I would be right for the next 2 or 3 years after paying $3000 to the dental technician.  But he mucked up the first setting so badly, I had to go back for a remoulding.  He was angry because I had my own ideas about the toxins in dentures, and so, disliking his authority on the subject  being challenged,  especially by a mere woman in his eyes, consequently made a really rough job of the dentures, as well as being quite abusive to me. “There you go – you’ve got teeth now”,  he said carelessly, as he pushed his awful handiwork into my mouth.  His work was so incredibly shoddy –   He  had made the plate up minus several of the teeth which I had had before, and he did not fit the dentures so that there was a correspondence between the two plates, upper and lower.  So there was no bite.  They simply did not function, and looked really terrible as well.  A bit like an old rabbit.

I couldn’t work out why his attitude had changed – The first time I had seen this dentist, aroung 7 years ago now, he was marvellous, gave me great service, as well as a great set of porcelain teeth set in the least toxic of the substances which he had available.  All I can think of is that he, too, is suffering toxic reaction from working with the highly toxic denture materials, and that his nerves are shot, and he is suffering depression.

Michele writes in a comment on my ‘Toxic Dentures’ post, about a dental technician who had to give up her practice because of denture toxins affecting her health.  This dentist now helps people with sensitivities to dentures by boiling them for around 24 hours, according to Michele’s comment.  This technique is supposed to negate many of the mobile poisons.

Because his treatment was so rough, I wonder if my dental technician really did use all the expensive products which he said he did.  I am not a dental technician, and so how would I know what products he actually used in the second, faulty, lot of teeth he made for me?  Judging from the treatment he gave me, I doubt he used the supposed non-allergenic materials.  My trust with this man is totally expired now.

The  procedure he took to correct the teeth by heating the teeth so that he could remould them and add the missing teeth,  ruined the life of the teeth for me.    Instead of getting about two or three years of wearing a non-hazardous denture, the denture’s life was shortened to only a year because of the heat the technician applied.  And possibly because of sub-standard materials.  In effect, it was this dentist’s shoddy work which resulted in the denture being ruined for me, as far as its safe life span went.  But of course, he would deny this to the bitter end.  So I haven’t been back to see these dental technicians again, although the plates were insured for several years beyond when I ceased to wear them.  I have subsequently accepted the loss of $3000 as a warning to avoid dentures and the likes of this man.

Heat is the worst thing for beginning the break-down of your denture.  Heat is the worst thing for all plastics, as heat causes break-down of plastic.  One example to prove my point is the warning that milk for babies should not be heated in a plastic bottle in a microwave, as the chemicals in the plastic leach into the baby’s milk.  Of course, microwaves are pretty intense things, but wearing a denture in your warm mouth for a few years will have a similar effect.  The chemicals in a porous denture made of a soft plastic or acrylic will start to leach into your body, making you sick.   The plastic or acrylics will begin to break down in an environment of warmth and enzymes from foods, saliva enzymes, and substances such as coffee, Vitamin C, fruit, garlic, and many things which are otherwise good for your health.

Laetrile Doctors and Alternative Treatments For Cancer.

That Laetrile, Vitamin B17  Inhibits Cancer Growth is a commonly accepted idea among many alternative  doctors and cancer therapists.   Vitamin B17 Laetrile/Amygdalin is thought to be one of the best natural  substances to take for the prevention of cancer.   If people have already succumbed to cancer, then Laetrile is of immense value because of its pain-relieving qualities alone.  It also has the capability of inhibiting the growth of a cancer.  Maore about what doctors and researchers have to say about Laetrile, Vitamin B17, or Amygdalin, later on.

I myself have used apricot kernels to help get rid of a breast lump which I suffered in my early 30’s.  Whether or not the lump was cancerous, I do not know, as I refused a biopsy, working on the premise that if Dr Max Gerson’s natural cure worked for cancer, as I believed it would after reading his book, then something similar to his diet would work to eliminate a cyst which was non-malignant.  Either way, I couldn’t lose.  And it surely did work –  After three months of taking mainly fresh juices, raw food, 2 raw organic egg yolks per day, almonds, castor oil every 2nd day, enemas, and several apricot kernels a day,  the lump disappeared.  It came back for a time after I relaxed the diet, but I resumed the diet again for several more months, and it disappeared for good.

While no-one claims that Vitamin B17 found in apricot kernels,  also called  Laetrile or Amygdalin, cures cancer on its own, many doctors, researchers and natural therapists have reported that it definitely hastens the recovery of a cancer patient, and improves the sense of well-being in a patient, when used in combination with other therapies.

Here are some of the beliefs held by doctors who have used alternative methods for treating cancer, including the use of Laetrile/Amygdalin, or Vitamin B17.

Some of the following  information comes from the book ‘Fresh Hope In Cancer’, by Maurice Finkel, B.Sc. M.Sc., M.Ed., Ed.D.N.D., published by Health Science Press, Devon, England, 1978, whilst other information is taken from various other sources, such as the online article “Laetrile doctors and researchers’.

Japanese doctor Shigeaki Sakai has said that   “…..no anti-cancer drug could make a cancerous patient improve faster than Laetrile.”  (see ‘Laetrile doctors and researchers’)  Dr Shigeaki Sakai’s view is shared by many other cancer therapists.

Dr Walter Ermer recommended taking between 3 to 5 apricot kernels a day as a supplement to his dietary regime for cancer.  Dr Walter Ermer wrote a booklet on the prevention of cancer.  He stressed that early diagnosis was important if a recovery was to be expected. He thought that a person was ‘halfway to the grave’ already, once cancer had been diagnosed by the usual method. He also had much to say about the profiteering which goes on from cancer:  “Profitting from this disease are medical doctors, the drug interests, fund drives, and government agencies representing vested interests rather than the people.”  Dr Ermer believed that a lack of Laetrile, or Vitamin B17, had a large role to play in the high incidence of cancer, along with a deficient pancreas,  bad living habits, and environmental pollution. (see page 41 of Finkel’s book)

 

Jason Vale’s Recovery From Cancer Using Prayer and Vitamin B17, Called Laetrile

Is One Cure For Cancer Vitamin B17, also  known as Laetrile or Amydgalin?

Jason Vale is a Christian man who recovered completely from cancer using regular prayer as well as making some changes and additions to his diet.  One thing he used in his daily diet  and which he attributes much to his recovery, was Laetrile, Vitamin B17, which is found in apricot kernels.

Jason Vale  has a web-site which helps people who wish to begin an alternative cancer treatment.  He is currently facing trial in America, because the FDA, the Food Drug Administration of America, have charged him with supplying a phone number to someone who wanted to obtain Laetrile in the form of Apricot kernels.

The FDA  have a history of chasing out anybody who treats cancer through alternative means, apparently because the pharmaceutical companies, backed by many people in the medical profession, are not receptive to any competition in the healing sciences.  If people can get well from cancer without using drugs, then this means no profits for the drug companies.

Of course, you have to be careful not to over-dose with the apricot kernels, as they contain cyanide which can kill you if it does not cure you.  As a preventative measure against degenerative disease, no more than 3 per day could be taken by a person of average build who is not on a special detoxifying regime for cancer.  The idea is that the body can take more apricot kernels – no more than 9 a day eaten in divided doses – if castor oil is used every second day, with daily enemas, as these cleansing measures would wash away many nutrients, and much of the cyanide in the kernels.  Without these detox measures, you could easily be poisoned if you were to take even 6 per day on a regular basis.  However, there are many other ways in which you can poison yourself by natural means if you so desire – eating rhubarb leaves, which look like spinach, will kill you quicker than anything.  So we don’t eat rhubarb leaves.  And rhubarb is not banned, because the FDA assumes that people are not going to do anything so stupid.

A steady diet of carrots alone will kill you, as you would be poisoned by too much beta carotene, a Vitamin A precursor.  Carrots are not banned, because the FDA assumes that people will not be so stupid as to eat carrots alone. Yet they have banned the miracle herb Comfrey because of this pretended danger – that people will eat too much of it – when the real reason is that they don’t want us to be able to use Comfrey, as they want to reserve its magical healing ingredients for themselves, and charge us the earth for it when it will actually grow like a week in your garden if you let it. If they hadn’t banned it.

And now, the pharmaceutical companies via the FDA are trying to outlaw people using apricot kernels for cancer.

Jason Vale’s case is a very interesting one:  He has the support of his Christian fellowship, and is going to fight his case to the MAX.  His lawyers claim that they have proof that the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies have known about the effectiveness of Vitamin B17, called Laetrile, for many years now, but that they have kept the value of Laetrile hidden, more or less because they do not want people to get well, but wish instead to sell them many kinds of expensive  drugs for their cancer treatments instead –   Drugs which are probably less effective than using Laetrile from apricot kernels, combined with a special detoxifying programme.

The story is a little similar to the tobacco one,  if this is true:  The tobacco industry knew for decades that tobacco smoking did in fact seriously harm people’s health, yet they kept this revelation under wraps because of the massive profits cigarette sales brought to them.

Dr Max Gerson, who successfully cured many people of cancer, is one eminent doctor whom the FDA  hounded and chased out of America,  mainly because he was a threat to the orthodox medical profession and their big bosses, the drug companies.  If Dr Gerson had been allowed to continue his cancer-healing practice in America, then the word would have got out, and pharmaceutical companies, as well as many doctors who sell their drugs off, would have been out of pocket.

Vitamin B17 is also found in the kernels of other stone fruits such as nectarines, peaches, plums, almonds, and seed fruits such as apples, pears, quinces, and grapes, as well as citrus fruits such as lemons and oranges.

The use of Vitamin B17 in apricot kernels for helping to reduce cancer masses is an idea which has been around for a long time.  Dr Max Gerson used Vitamin B17 in his alternative treatments for cancer in the mid 20th century, as did Dr Anne Wigmore, Walter Last, and probably many hundreds more therapists who were helping people to recover from cancer.

Vitamin B17 helps to reduce the pain of cancer, and has been found to be helpful in reducing cancer masses when used in combination with other detoxifying measures such as castor oil, enemas, and predominantly fresh juice diets.  Of course, not even Dr Max Gerson had a 100% success rate with his alternative cancer treatment.  But many people who have not had success with orthodox treatment, or who decided in the very beginning that they would not use radiation or chemotherapy methods  in their treatments, have recovered from cancer and other degenerative disease, such as multiple sclerosis, parkinson’s, and chronic arthritis by following a strict dietary regime such as Dr Gerson’s cancer treatment.

Jason Vale is one modern person who has been successful in recovering from cancer using these alternative methods, after medical science had given  up all hope of his recovery.

Jacqui Davison is another who adopted the natural cleansing approach, and lived to tell the tale, after she  been given up by her doctors and given only three weeks or so to live.  Jacqui wrote a book about her recovery.